Lecture 5

Problem 31. Let (π,U)(\pi,U) and (π,W)(\pi,W) be subrepresentations of a representation (π,V)(\pi,V) such that V=U⊕WV=U\oplus W. Verify that the map

(𝐮,𝐰)↦𝐮+𝐰({\bf u},{\bf w})\mapsto{\bf u}+{\bf w}

is a GG-isomorphism from (π,U)⊕(π,W)(\pi,U)\oplus(\pi,W) to (π,V)(\pi,V).

Solution: Let ϕ\phi be the map in question. It should be clear from prior knowledge that this is an isomorphism of vector spaces. Clearly

ϕ⁢((𝐮1+λ⁢𝐮2,𝐰1+λ⁢𝐰2))=𝐮1+λ⁢𝐮2+𝐰1+λ⁢𝐰2=ϕ⁢((𝐮1,𝐰1))+λ⁢ϕ⁢((𝐮2,𝐰2)),\phi(({\bf u}_{1}+\lambda{\bf u}_{2},{\bf w}_{1}+\lambda{\bf w}_{2}))={\bf u}_% {1}+\lambda{\bf u}_{2}+{\bf w}_{1}+\lambda{\bf w}_{2}=\phi(({\bf u}_{1},{\bf w% }_{1}))+\lambda\phi(({\bf u}_{2},{\bf w}_{2})),

for all 𝐮1,𝐮2∈U{\bf u}_{1},{\bf u}_{2}\in U, 𝐰1,𝐰2∈W{\bf w}_{1},{\bf w}_{2}\in W and λ∈k\lambda\in k. Also for (u,w)(u,w) to be in ker⁡ϕ\ker\phi both uu and ww must be zero, as U∩W={0}U\cap W=\{0\}. As the dimensions of both VV and U⊕WU\oplus W are the same, by definition, this must be a bijection and hence an isomorphism of vector spaces.

Now let g∈Gg\in G and (𝐮,𝐰)∈U⊕w({\bf u},{\bf w})\in U\oplus w, then

ϕ⁢((π⁢(g)⁢𝐮,π⁢(g)⁢𝐰))=π⁢(g)⁢𝐮+π⁢(g)⁢𝐰=π⁢(g)⁢(𝐮+𝐰)=π⁢(g)⁢ϕ⁢((𝐮,𝐰)).\phi((\pi(g){\bf u},\pi(g){\bf w}))=\pi(g){\bf u}+\pi(g){\bf w}=\pi(g)({\bf u}% +{\bf w})=\pi(g)\phi(({\bf u},{\bf w})).

Hence it is a GG-homomorphism and thus a GG-isomorphism.

Problem 32. Verify that

⟨π⁢(g)⁢𝐯,π⁢(g)⁢𝐮⟩=⟨𝐯,𝐮⟩∀𝐯,𝐮∈V,g∈G\langle\pi(g){\bf v},\pi(g){\bf u}\rangle=\langle{\bf v},{\bf u}\rangle\qquad% \forall{\bf v},{\bf u}\in V,\;g\in G

is equivalent to

⟨π⁢(g)⁢𝐯,𝐮⟩=⟨𝐯,π⁢(g−1)⁢𝐮⟩∀𝐯,𝐮∈V,g∈G.\langle\pi(g){\bf v},{\bf u}\rangle=\langle{\bf v},\pi(g^{-1}){\bf u}\rangle% \qquad\forall{\bf v},{\bf u}\in V,\;g\in G.

Solution: We apply π⁢(g)−1\pi(g)^{-1} to the second term on both sides:

⟨π⁢(g)⁢𝐯,π⁢(g)⁢𝐮⟩\displaystyle\langle\pi(g){\bf v},\pi(g){\bf u}\rangle =⟨𝐯,𝐮⟩,\displaystyle=\langle{\bf v},{\bf u}\rangle,
⟨π⁢(g)⁢𝐯,π⁢(g)−1⁢π⁢(g)⁢𝐮⟩\displaystyle\langle\pi(g){\bf v},\pi(g)^{-1}\pi(g){\bf u}\rangle =⟨𝐯,π⁢(g)−1⁢𝐮⟩,\displaystyle=\langle{\bf v},\pi(g)^{-1}{\bf u}\rangle,
⟨π⁢(g)⁢𝐯,Id⁢𝐮⟩\displaystyle\langle\pi(g){\bf v},{\,\mathrm{Id}}{\bf u}\rangle =⟨𝐯,π⁢(g)−1⁢𝐮⟩,\displaystyle=\langle{\bf v},\pi(g)^{-1}{\bf u}\rangle,
⟨π⁢(g)⁢𝐯,𝐮⟩\displaystyle\langle\pi(g){\bf v},{\bf u}\rangle =⟨𝐯,π⁢(g−1)⁢𝐮⟩,\displaystyle=\langle{\bf v},\pi(g^{-1}){\bf u}\rangle,

for all 𝐯,𝐮∈V{\bf v},{\bf u}\in V and all g∈Gg\in G.

Problem 33. Let VV be a finite-dimensional complex vector space with a basis {𝐛i}i=1,…,n\{{\bf b}_{i}\}_{i=1,\ldots,n}, where n=dim⁡Vn=\operatorname{dim}V. Show that

⟨∑i=1nxi⁢𝐛i,∑j=1nyj⁢𝐛j⟩:=∑i=1nxi⁢yi¯,\left\langle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum_{j=1}^{n}y_{j}{\bf b}_{j}% \right\rangle:=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}\overline{y_{i}},

for xi,yj∈ℂx_{i},\,y_{j}\in{\mathbb{C}}, defines an inner product on VV.

Solution: Consider ∑i=1nxi⁢𝐛i,∑i=1nyi⁢𝐛i,∑i=1nzi⁢𝐛i∈V\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum_{i=1}^{n}y_{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum_{i=1}^{n}z_% {i}{\bf b}_{i}\in V and λ∈ℂ\lambda\in{\mathbb{C}}, then

⟨∑i=1nxi⁢𝐛i+λ⁢∑i=1nyi⁢𝐛i,∑j=1nzj⁢𝐛j⟩\displaystyle\left\langle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}{\bf b}_{i}+\lambda\sum_{i=1}^{n}y% _{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum_{j=1}^{n}z_{j}{\bf b}_{j}\right\rangle =∑i=1n(xi+λ⁢yi)⁢zi¯\displaystyle=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(x_{i}+\lambda y_{i})\overline{z_{i}}
=∑i=1nxi⁢zi¯+λ⁢∑i=1nyi⁢zi¯\displaystyle=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}\overline{z_{i}}+\lambda\sum_{i=1}^{n}y_{i}% \overline{z_{i}}
=⟨∑i=1nxi⁢𝐛i,∑j=1nzj⁢𝐛j⟩+λ⁢⟨∑i=1nyi⁢𝐛i,∑j=1nzj⁢𝐛j⟩,\displaystyle=\left\langle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum_{j=1}^{n}z_{j}{% \bf b}_{j}\right\rangle+\lambda\left\langle\sum_{i=1}^{n}y_{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum% _{j=1}^{n}z_{j}{\bf b}_{j}\right\rangle,

so it is linear in the first term. We have

⟨∑i=1nxi⁢𝐛i,∑j=1nyj⁢𝐛j⟩=∑i=1nxi⁢yi¯=∑i=1nxi¯⁢yi¯=⟨∑i=1nyi⁢𝐛i,∑j=1nxj⁢𝐛j⟩¯,\left\langle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum_{j=1}^{n}y_{j}{\bf b}_{j}% \right\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}\overline{y_{i}}=\overline{\sum_{i=1}^{n}% \overline{x_{i}}y_{i}}=\overline{\left\langle\sum_{i=1}^{n}y_{i}{\bf b}_{i},% \sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{j}{\bf b}_{j}\right\rangle},

so it is conjugate symmetric. Lastly

⟨∑i=1nxi⁢𝐛i,∑j=1nxj⁢𝐛j⟩=∑i=1nxi⁢xi¯,\left\langle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}{\bf b}_{i},\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{j}{\bf b}_{j}% \right\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}\overline{x_{i}},

and recall that xi⁢xi¯>0x_{i}\overline{x_{i}}>0 for xi≠0x_{i}\neq 0 so it is also positive definite. Thus we have an inner product.

Problem 34. Fill in the remaining details of the proof of Proposition 5.10, i.e. show that ⟨⋅,⋅⟩G\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{G} is linear in the first argument, conjugate-symmetric, and positive-definite.

Solution: We repeatedly use the fact that ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle is an inner product. Consider 𝐮,𝐯,𝐰∈V{\bf u},{\bf v},{\bf w}\in V and λ∈ℂ\lambda\in{\mathbb{C}}, then

⟨𝐮+λ⁢𝐯,𝐰⟩G\displaystyle\langle{\bf u}+\lambda{\bf v},{\bf w}\rangle_{G} =1|G|⁢∑h∈G⟨π⁢(h)⁢(𝐮+λ⁢𝐯),π⁢(h)⁢𝐰⟩\displaystyle=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{h\in G}\langle\pi(h)({\bf u}+\lambda{\bf v}),% \pi(h){\bf w}\rangle
=1|G|⁢∑h∈G⟨π⁢(h)⁢𝐮,π⁢(h)⁢𝐮⟩+λ⁢1|G|⁢∑h∈G⟨π⁢(h)⁢𝐯,π⁢(h)⁢𝐰⟩\displaystyle=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{h\in G}\langle\pi(h){\bf u},\pi(h){\bf u}% \rangle+\lambda\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{h\in G}\langle\pi(h){\bf v},\pi(h){\bf w}\rangle
=⟨𝐮,𝐰⟩G+λ⁢⟨𝐯,𝐰⟩G,\displaystyle=\langle{\bf u},{\bf w}\rangle_{G}+\lambda\langle{\bf v},{\bf w}% \rangle_{G},

so it is linear in the first term. We have

⟨𝐮,𝐯⟩G=1|G|⁢∑h∈G⟨π⁢(h)⁢𝐮,π⁢(h)⁢𝐯⟩=1|G|⁢∑h∈G⟨π⁢(h)⁢𝐯,π⁢(h)⁢𝐮⟩¯=⟨𝐯,𝐮⟩G¯,\langle{\bf u},{\bf v}\rangle_{G}=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{h\in G}\langle\pi(h){\bf u% },\pi(h){\bf v}\rangle=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{h\in G}\overline{\langle\pi(h){\bf v% },\pi(h){\bf u}\rangle}=\overline{\langle{\bf v},{\bf u}\rangle_{G}},

so it is conjugate symmetric. Lastly

⟨𝐯,𝐯⟩G=1|G|⁢∑h∈G⟨π⁢(h)⁢𝐯,π⁢(h)⁢𝐯⟩,\langle{\bf v},{\bf v}\rangle_{G}=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{h\in G}\langle\pi(h){\bf v% },\pi(h){\bf v}\rangle,

and each ⟨π⁢(h)⁢𝐯,π⁢(h)⁢𝐯⟩\langle\pi(h){\bf v},\pi(h){\bf v}\rangle is greater than zero for π⁢(h)⁢𝐯≠0\pi(h){\bf v}\neq 0 and zero otherwise. Thus ⟨⋅,⋅⟩G\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{G} is positive definite and therefore an inner product.

Problem 35. Let (π,V)(\pi,V) be a finite-dimensional unitary representation of a group GG, with GG-invariant inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle. Show that the matrix of any π⁢(g)\pi(g) with respect to a orthonormal basis for ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle is unitary (recall that a matrix is unitary if M∗(=M¯)t=M−1M^{*}(=\overline{M}{\,{}^{\mathrm{t}}\!}\,)=M^{-1}).

Solution: Let {𝐞1,…,𝐞n}\{{\bf e}_{1},\ldots,{\bf e}_{n}\} be an orthonormal basis of VV and let MM be the matrix of π⁢(g)\pi(g) with respect to this basis, for some g∈Gg\in G. As ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle is GG-invariant we have

⟨M⁢𝐞i,M⁢𝐞j⟩=⟨𝐞i,𝐞j⟩={1if ⁢i=j,0if ⁢i≠j.\langle M{\bf e}_{i},M{\bf e}_{j}\rangle=\langle{\bf e}_{i},{\bf e}_{j}\rangle% =\begin{cases}1\quad&\text{if }i=j,\\ 0\quad&\text{if }i\neq j.\end{cases}

So {M⁢𝐞i}1≤i≤n\{M{\bf e}_{i}\}_{1\leq i\leq n} is also an orthonormal basis for VV. Note that M⁢𝐞iM{\bf e}_{i} is a column of the matrix MM, hence the columns of MM are an orthonormal basis of VV. Thus M⁢Mt¯=IdM\overline{M^{t}}={\,\mathrm{Id}} and we have that our matrix is unitary.

Problem 36. Show the following:
Lemma 5.13. Let (π1,U)(\pi_{1},U), (π2,V)(\pi_{2},V), and (π3,W)(\pi_{3},W) be representations of a group GG. Then

  1. (i)
    ​

    HomG⁢(U⊕V,W)=HomG⁢(U,W)⊕HomG⁢(V,W)\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(U\oplus V,W)=\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(U,W)\oplus\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(V,W)

  2. (ii)
    ​

    HomG⁢(W,U⊕V)=HomG⁢(W,U)⊕HomG⁢(W,V)\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(W,U\oplus V)=\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(W,U)\oplus\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(W,V)

Solution: Given R∈Hom⁡(U⊕V,W)R\in\operatorname{Hom}(U\oplus V,W), we we define φ⁢(R)=(φ1⁢(R),φ2⁢(R))∈Hom⁢(U,W)⊕Hom⁢(V,W)\varphi(R)=(\varphi_{1}(R),\varphi_{2}(R))\in\mathrm{Hom}(U,W)\oplus\mathrm{% Hom}(V,W) by

φ1⁢(R)⁢u=R⁢(u,0),φ2⁢(R)⁢v=R⁢(0,v)∀u∈U,v∈V.\varphi_{1}(R)u=R(u,0),\quad\varphi_{2}(R)v=R(0,v)\qquad\forall u\in U,\,v\in V.

Similarly, define a map φ~:Hom⁡(U,W)⊕Hom⁡(V,W)→Hom⁡(U⊕V,W)\widetilde{\varphi}:\operatorname{Hom}(U,W)\oplus\operatorname{Hom}(V,W)% \rightarrow\operatorname{Hom}(U\oplus V,W) by

φ~⁢(S,T)⁢(u,v)=S⁢u+T⁢v∀(u,v)∈U⊕V.\widetilde{\varphi}(S,T)(u,v)=Su+Tv\qquad\forall(u,v)\in U\oplus V.

Routine linear algebra verifications show that all the maps above are linear in the relevant variables, and that φ⁢φ~⁢(S,T)=(S,T)\varphi\widetilde{\varphi}(S,T)=(S,T) and φ~⁢φ⁢(R)=R\widetilde{\varphi}\varphi(R)=R, giving the identity

Hom⁢(U⊕V,W)=Hom⁢(U,W)⊕Hom⁢(V,W).\mathrm{Hom}(U\oplus V,W)=\mathrm{Hom}(U,W)\oplus\mathrm{Hom}(V,W).

It remains to show that φ⁢(HomG⁡(U⊕V,W))⊂HomG⁢(U,W)⊕HomG⁢(V,W)\varphi(\operatorname{Hom}_{G}(U\oplus V,W))\subset\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(U,W)\oplus% \mathrm{Hom}_{G}(V,W), and φ~⁢(HomG⁢(U,W)⊕HomG⁢(V,W))⊂HomG⁢(U⊕V,W)\widetilde{\varphi}\big{(}\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(U,W)\oplus\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(V,W)\big% {)}\subset\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(U\oplus V,W). Given R∈HomG⁡(U⊕V,W)R\in\operatorname{Hom}_{G}(U\oplus V,W), we verify that φ⁢(R)\varphi(R) intertwines with the GG-actions: for all u∈Uu\in U,

φ1⁢(R)⁢(π1⁢(g)⁢u)=R⁢(π1⁢(g)⁢u,0)=R⁢(π1⁢(g)⁢u,π2⁢(g)⁢0)=R⁢(π1⊕π2⁢(g)⁢(u,0))=π3⁢(g)⁢R⁢(u,0)=π3⁢φ1⁢(R)⁢u,\displaystyle\varphi_{1}(R)(\pi_{1}(g)u)=R(\pi_{1}(g)u,0)=R(\pi_{1}(g)u,\pi_{2% }(g)0)=R\big{(}\pi_{1}\oplus\pi_{2}(g)(u,0)\big{)}=\pi_{3}(g)R(u,0)=\pi_{3}% \varphi_{1}(R)u,

showing that φ1⁢(R)∈HomG⁡(U,W)\varphi_{1}(R)\in\operatorname{Hom}_{G}(U,W). A similar computation gives φ2⁢(R)∈HomG⁡(V,W)\varphi_{2}(R)\in\operatorname{Hom}_{G}(V,W), hence φ⁢(R)=(φ1⁢(R),φ2⁢(R))∈HomG⁢(U,W)⊕HomG⁢(V,W)\varphi(R)=(\varphi_{1}(R),\varphi_{2}(R))\in\mathrm{Hom}_{G}(U,W)\oplus% \mathrm{Hom}_{G}(V,W). In the other direction, let S∈HomG⁡(U,W)S\in\operatorname{Hom}_{G}(U,W) and T∈HomG⁡(V,W)T\in\operatorname{Hom}_{G}(V,W). Then for all (u,v)∈U⊕V(u,v)\in U\oplus V,

φ~⁢(S,T)⁢π1⊕π2⁢(g)⁢(u,v)=φ~⁢(S,T)⁢(π1⁢(g)⁢u,π2⁢(g)⁢v)=S⁢π1⁢(g)⁢u+T⁢π2⁢(g)⁢v\displaystyle\widetilde{\varphi}(S,T)\pi_{1}\oplus\pi_{2}(g)(u,v)=\widetilde{% \varphi}(S,T)(\pi_{1}(g)u,\pi_{2}(g)v)=S\pi_{1}(g)u+T\pi_{2}(g)v
=π3⁢(g)⁢S⁢u+π3⁢(g)⁢T⁢v=π3⁢(g)⁢(S⁢u+T⁢v)=π3⁢(g)⁢φ~⁢(S,T)⁢(u,v),\displaystyle=\pi_{3}(g)Su+\pi_{3}(g)Tv=\pi_{3}(g)(Su+Tv)=\pi_{3}(g)\widetilde% {\varphi}(S,T)(u,v),

showing that φ~⁢(S,T)∈HomG⁡(U⊕V,W)\widetilde{\varphi}(S,T)\in\operatorname{Hom}_{G}(U\oplus V,W). (ii) is proved analogously.