Lecture 13
Problem 77. Let be the lift to of a representation of . Show that
Solution: Let be an eigenbasis of for , i.e. , and is a basis of . Then , and
and hence is an eigenbasis for w.r.t. , giving .
Problem 78. Show Proposition 13.7:
Prop. 13.7. Every normal subgroup of a finite group may be expressed as
for some collection of irreducible representations of .
Proceed as follows:
-
(a)
Let denote the irreducible representations of , and let be the lift of to . Define
Show that is normal in .
-
(b)
Use Proposition 13.2 to show that , and hence .
-
(c)
Use Theorem 6.6 to show that .
-
(d)
Use Propositions 13.8 to show that each is the lift of an irreducible representation representation of .
-
(e)
Use Theorem 6.6 to show that .
-
(f)
Conclude that .
Solution:
-
(a)
This is a direct consequence of the two following facts from group theory (i) If is a group homomorphism, then is a normal subgroup of (ii) The intersection of two normal subgroups is a normal subgroup.
-
(b)
By Proposition 13.2, for each , hence , hence .
-
(c)
By Theorem 6.6, .
-
(d)
Since is an irreducible representation of , its lift is an irreducible representation of . By construction , hence by Proposition 13.2, we may express as the lift of a representation of . Since is an irreducible representation of , Proposition 13.3 gives that is an irreducible representation of .
-
(e)
We have shown that each is an irreducible representation of . Theorem 6.6 then gives , provided that the representations are all pairwise non-isomorphic to each other. The representations are non-isomorphic representations of , hence for each pair , we can find such that
Then by Problem 77,
and similarly for , giving
showing that the representations are non-isomorphic.
-
(f)
By (b), (c), and (e), we have
hence , i.e. . Since , we then have that , as desired.
Problem 79. Using the character table of , find the character table of . Using the character table, show that is simple (that is, it has no nontrivial proper normal subgroups). Hint: every element of is conjugate to its inverse.
Solution: The character table of is
size: | 1 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 30 | 24 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | |
4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | -1 | ||
4 | -2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | |
5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | |
5 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0 | |
6 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
We recall that the conjugacy classes of are given as follows (cf. Problem 51 Lecture 10)
class | size |
[e] | 1 |
[(1 2)(3 4)] | 15 |
[(1 2 3)] | 20 |
[(1 2 3 4 5)] | 12 |
[(1 3 4 5 2)] | 12 |
We know the trivial representation, and compute the norm of the restriction of :
so is irreducible. We also consider :
so this is also irreducible. The table so far reads
size: | 1 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 12 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | -1 | |
5 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
From this, we see that there must be two 3-dimensional irreducible representations. We now consider . Observe that
so is the direct sum of two distinct irreducible representations of . We compute the following inner products:
so the two remaining irreducible representations we are looking for are both subrepresentations of . The character table is then of the form
size: | 1 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 12 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | -1 | |
5 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
Since each element of is conjugate to its inverse , hence . Using Theorem 19 for the norms of the columns:
Solving these gives , , , . Column orthogonality gives that is the quadratic conjugate of , giving the table
size: | 1 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 12 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | -1 | |
5 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
We see that each irreducible representation is faithful, i.e. has trivial kernel. By Proposition 13.7, we then have that is the only proper normal subgroup of .
Problem 80. (Challenging!) Let be a faithful finite-dimensional representation of a finite group . Given an irreducible representation of , show that is isomorphic to a subrepresentation of for some .
Solution: We outline two different solutions:
-
(i)
Using analysis: We start by showing the following lemma:
Lemma: If , then for some .
Proof: , where each is an eigenvalue of , and hence a root of unity. Since
equality holds in the triangle equality if the numbers are colinear, we must have , hence .
We now define by
Observe that by the Lemma above, is a subgroup of : if , then , , hence , and so , giving , and so , hence .
Let . Then for any irreducible representation of , we have
For , we write , hence , and so
Since is faithful, we must have for (otherwise , hence ). Thus , is an isomorphism from to a finite subgroup of the unit circle; is therefore cyclic, and the values taken by must be , where . Note that every other irreducible character of is of the form for some . There then exist such that
giving
Letting gives
Summing over the , we get
We enter this into the expression for obtained above, giving
Since , taking large enough gives
with . The right-hand side is then non-zero, giving , i.e. occurs as a subrepresentation of .
-
(ii)
Using linear algebra: Denote the distinct non-zero values takes by . We may assume that . For , define
Using that is faithful, we have . For each , we have
(here “” denotes the standard inner product on ). We compute the determinant of the following Vandermonde matrix:
The vectors , , then form a basis of . Since , the vector is non-zero, and thus cannot be orthogonal to every vector in a basis of . There therefore exists such that