Let be a finite group. The group ring has as elements formal linear combinations
with multiplied according to the ‘rule forced by ’, that is,
This is a noncommutative ring (if is not abelian).
To elaborate, the symbols for are basis vectors for a vector space of dimension , which we call the group ring.
Let and be elements of . Then
If is a representation of , then we can ’multiply’ any element of by any element of :
The group ring is a vector space of dimension . It has a linear left action of :
Therefore we have a representation of on called the left regular representation.
In fact, the regular representation is just the permutation representation for the action of on itself by left multiplication. If we adopt the ’functional point of view’ mentioned before, we get another way of thinking about this.
Let
be the space of functions from . Define a representation of on by
The representation is isomorphic to the regular representation .
This is simply the discussion in Remark 1.9 applied to this partiuclar case.
When we refer to the ’regular representation’, then, we mean either or according to which is most convenient.
Let be any representation of . Then there is an isomorphism of vector spaces
Equivalently, .
This is short, but difficult to wrap your head around. The idea is to provide a recipe to turn a -homomorphism into an element of and a recipe to turn an element of into a -homomorphism and check that these recipes are inverse to each other.
If is a -homomorphism, let
Conversely, if let be given by
you can check that is indeed a -homomorphism.
Then I claim that the maps and are linear maps between and that are two-sided inverses of each other, so these vector spaces are isomorphic. It is clear that they are linear maps. We must check that
and
for all .
Let . Then
as required.
Let and let . Then, for
since is a -homomorphism. As are linear, this implies as required. ∎
This has a beautiful consequence: the sum of the squares of the dimensions of the irreducible representations is equal to the order of the group. We write for the set of isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of .
Every irreducible representation of is a constituent of the regular representation with multiplicity . In other words,
(Sum of squares formula.) We have
where the sum runs over the isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of . In particular, is finite.
By Maschke’s theorem, we can decompose as a direct sum of irreducibles in which each isomorphism class of irreducible representations appears times.
Immediate from equating dimensions on both sides of the first part and noting that . ∎
Verify the sum of squares formula for dihedral groups.
Note that this gives another approach to the classification of representations of dihedral groups. First, write down all the irreducible representations and check that they are non-isomorphic. Then, by the sum of squares formula, you have found everything!