We determine the character table of . First, we have the trivial representation and the sign character :
Next, we consider the permutation representation of on . This contains a copy of the trivial representation, so we write for some representation , whose character satisfies
Notice that we also have an operation on representations known as twisting: if is an irreducible representation of with character and is a one-dimensional character of , then we can define a new representation, , of on by the formula . It has character . In this case, we can look at and see that it will also be the character of an irreducible representation.
Since , is irreducible. Note also that is different to , and also irreducible.
There is one more row of the table to find. This can be done using orthonormality with the first column, remembering that the dimension must be a positive integer (in this case, it must be two): we obtain that the full character table is
Notice that we constructed the character of the final representation without constructing the representation itself!
Recall that if is a normal subgroup then we can lift representations of to representations of , as in Section 1.2.3.
If is the character of a representation of and is the character of its lift to , then
for all .
Immediate from the definition. ∎
In exercise 1.29, we explained how to lift the irreducible two-dimensional representation of to a representation of . Then its character agrees with that called in the character table of .
We can recognise the kernel of a representation using its character.
Let be a representation of with character and dimension . Then
It is clear that then . We leave the converse as an exercise. ∎
We apply the method of Theorem 2.19 to decompose a naturally occuring representation of . Let
Then acts on . If we think of as the symmetry group of the tetrahedron with vertices labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, then this is ‘the same as’ the action on the set of edges (each edge being determined by a set of two vertices).
Let be the permutation representation obtained from and let be its character. Then
We have:
Then we compute , . It follows that
So
where is the trivial representation, is isomorphic to the 3-D representation of with character , and is isomorphic to the unique 2-D representation of (which has character ).
In the previous example, find , , as subspaces of .
The problem of finding irreducible representations of such that is isomorphic to their direct sum is called “decomposing into irreducibles representations (or irreps, or irreducibles)”. It can be solved with character theory as in example 2.24.
The problem of finding irreducible subrepresentations of such that it is their (internal) direct sum is called “decomposing into irreducible subrepresentations” and can require more understanding of the nature of the representation . Exercise 2.25 is an example of this.